In addition to all of its support, political, spiritual and financial, the Government of India has sent a letter encouraging the Thai authorities to bestow Heritage status on the Nadukal. This subject has been broached with the Governor of Kanchanaburi and is in the earliest stages of discussion.
============================
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=987913273750932&set=pcb.987915857084007
Future RKB museum ?
I have archived this photo from MAY 2026 here not because I believe that it will actually come to fruition, but because it raises so many issues that the Thais have avoided for decades.
As I write this note, we have yet to determine who would be underwriting such a project. This is not the type of proposal that would likely come from commercial interests. It must be governmental; perhaps the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT). But for them this would be a major turn of events. As I have noted in many other essays, the Thais would just as soon ignore this entire period of history. As far as they are concerned the Death Railway was an event perpetrated by the Japanese on Allied POWs and Asians from other countries and is not truly a part of Thai history. If David Lean hadn’t made that damned movie, no one would care about that aging iron bridge!
But in the early 60s, tourists began arriving looking for that bridge in the movie. Some refused to believe that the existing iron bridge was indeed the real bridge over the (nonexistent) River Kwai. Eventually the Thais were forced to make accommodations to cater to the tourists. What followed is known in the social sciences as commodification. [see Section 26.2 for a more in-depth discussion of this concept]. The inevitable commercialization of the surrounding area was gradual and haphazard. It is doubtful that anyone predicted just how large the market area would become.
At first there was just a jumble of small stalls catering to the needs of the visitors: food, drinks and souvenirs. It wasn’t long before the ‘big money’ moved in and built more permanent structures offering mostly jewelry and tacky souvenirs. Add a parking lot and a coffee shop and you have created a typical Thai strip mall! Restaurants, a hotel and, of course, a 7-11 soon followed. The rampant commercialization of the area was complete.
What was missing was any real history! It’s unclear exactly when but the local government (not TAT) eventually added a story board on a wall not far away. This does a reasonably good job of relating the story of the Thai-Burma Railway in a few hundred words. The problem is that few of the visitors ever read it! It is hidden away behind the market stalls. If you are not looking for it, chances are you’d walk right past it.
There are two tiny monuments that appeared decades later, but if you don’t already know a bit of the history they don’t really help to enlighten you further. In the mid-1990s, a Chinese businessman opened what he called a museum. First, he stole the name from an older and more authentic enterprise. Then he stocked his building with anything and everything that even looked historic. Unfortunately, almost none of it had anything whatsoever to do with WW2 much less the Railway[1]!
There were a number of POWs camps in the Kanchanaburi area where the survivors of the 1942-43 construction were consolidated through the end of the war in late 1945. By the beginning of 1946, all but a few had been repatriated. One of those camps was located only a few hundred meters from the famous bridge. Today, there is not the slightest remnant of that camp. What does remain is a memorial built in 1944 at the behest of the Japanese Commandant by ‘volunteers’ among the Allied POWs. That obelisk shows up clearly on late war aerial recon photos of the bridges. It is known today as the Thai-anusorn memorial and although it is just a few hundred meters from the bridge it is largely unknown and unpublicized. This returns us to the lack of interest in the Thai government of actively describing and prompting any of the existing remnants of that era.
Which brings us back to the artist’s rendering of the proposed development. It would seem that the myriad of market stalls that blanket the area would be moved to the market building at the top of the drawing. I have annotated in red the current businesses.
The focal point of this project would seem to be the museum. Given the Thai government’s handling of this entire era, it is impossible to predict just what story would be told and from whose perspective. Just who would provide the material for the exhibits and displays in such a building? Another critical question might be, are the day-trippers – especially the Thais – interested enough in the actual history that transpired here to pay an admission fee?
[1] In early 2025, following his death, the museum closed its doors.